MDC-T
spokesman and COPAC co-chairperson, Douglas Mwonzora, urged Zimbabweans to
adopt the draft because "it limits the president to a maximum of two terms
in office, while the current constitution allows the Head of State to stand for
election as many times as he or she likes".
Poor, poor,
Douglas Mwonzora; he has really run out of ideas and so he is digging really
deep to find a valid reason why Zimbabweans should vote yes in the upcoming
referendum!
This primary
reason Zimbabwe was asked in the GPA agreement to implement a number of
democratic reforms and to write a new DEMOCRATIC constitution was NOT because
we desperately needed to limit the maximum terms the state president can save.
The primary reason we needed a new constitution was to ensure the next
elections will be free and fair and a true reflection of the democratic wishes
of the people of Zimbabwe and not a repeat of the wanton violence of the
discredited 2008 elections.
The primary
question therefore one must ask is: has
a) the agreed
democratic institutional reforms been implemented necessary to make all the
democratic institutions like the media, Police, Judiciary, etc. independent and
strong to provide the checks and balances expected of them in a functioning and
healthy democracy and
b) is this
Copac constitution the democratic constitution the nation expected
To deliver
and guarantee free and fair elections – with a free media, free of violence;
one needs a resounding YES to a) and a resounding YES in b). This is an AND
GATE as contrast to an OR GATE because an unsatisfactory performance is one or
both mean the intended end result – free and fair elections - will not be
delivered.
It is a well-established
fact no one serious would dispute that Mugabe has stubbornly refused to
implement the reforms and Tsvangirai capitulated. So the answer to a) is a
resounding NO.
Having
capitulated or the reforms the new Copac constitution was then drafted with the
clear understanding that it would not force the implementation of the reforms;
Mugabe saw to it that it did not and hence ended up “dictating” the
constitution. The answer to b) is a
resound NO too.
It is
another well-established fact no one serious would dispute that Zimbabwe is not
going to have free and fair elections this year. There is no free media and every
day there reports of the political intimidation and harassment already. The
violence will go into overdrive after the referendum with the yes vote safely
in the bag; Zanu PF would not want to spook the people by having violence
before the referendum.
When the answers
to both a) and b) are a no and no and the facts on the ground confirm there
will be no free and fair elections how can anyone then justify voting for
anything else in the referendum other that a NO.
The need to
fix the maximum terms and age a president can serve and be, have assumed greater
prominence than they rightly deserve only because the nation was frustrated at
the reality of having Mugabe ruling for another day more. 33 years was more
than what the people could endure! But if one examined the facts one would
immediate see the people would have got rid of Mugabe years ago if elections
had been free and fair. In other words having failed to get rid of Mugabe
through the ballot they were now ferreting for other ways because they had
really lost faith in the electoral path.
Mugabe
kicked out the age restriction just as he kicked out everything else he did not
like in the Copac constitution. He is 89 years old and sickly accepting a
maximum of another ten years in office is hardly a compromise now is it!
The
overwhelming majority in Zimbabwe have had all their rights, freedoms and
liberties eroded away by this Mugabe dictators; instead of being citizens we been
reduced to subjects or, for the over 30
000 murdered by the regime over the years, slaves who do not have the right to
life itself. No slave would give up his/her demand to be free because they have
the assurance of a new slave-master every ten years at most! If any the slave or
subject was to do that then would be out of ignorance of the true value of freedom
or what it means to be a citizen!
Douglas
Mwonzora is making a big song and dance about Copac having a clause setting the
maximum terms of the president only because that is the best crumb one can glean
from this rubbish Copac constitution! Poor, poor Douglas Mwonzora; he talked
about and carried this Copac Constitution as if he was Leonardo De Vinci
carrying the Mona Lisa and now it turns it to be rubbish! Poor, poor Douglas
Mwonzora!
No comments:
Post a Comment