Tendai Biti has
successfully challenged the last week’s ban of all street protests by senior
Police Officer.
“Following the
suspension of the ban on Wednesday, Biti said Justice Priscilla Chigumba’s
ruling was “a brave judgement that asserts the independence of the courts,” said
the New Zimbabwe report.
Yes the Judge was
brave, given that only a few days ago Mugabe publicly denounced the courts for “recklessness”
in allowing street protests to take place. Recent protests had led to the burning
and looting of private and public property and the usual running battles between
the Police, armed to the teeth with tear-gas, water cannons and truncheons, and
the protesters throwing stones and blocking roads with whatever was handy.
Still, I would
say describing the judgement as proof of “the independence” of the judiciary is
being politically naïve and premature, to say the least, for three reasons:
1)
It is factually incorrect to even suggest that
Zimbabwe’s judiciary is independent because there are many times in the past
when the judiciary’s independence has been found wanting. Take the case when Didymus
Mutasa tried to challenge his legality of dismissal from Zanu PF; Mugabe said
he would want to see the “Judge who would try the case” and the case was never
brought before the bench. Tendai Biti would be very familiar with many MDC election
results court challenges, some dating back to 2005, which are still pending. I
stand corrected, but I know on not even one single case where Mugabe or Zanu PF
are the complainant that has ever been delayed for more than a few weeks much
less kicked into the tall grass and forgotten
2)
Now that Mugabe has his brownie points in the
bag – even the opposition agree the country’s judiciary is “independent” – now
prizes for saying what is now going to happen next! The regime will step up the
pressure of the judiciary to ban future protests and rallies – right! It is for
the Police and not the Judges to ensure all public protests are adequately
policed to stop the troublemakers, the looters, etc. In the past Zanu PF has
deployed the overzealous war veterans or its party’s youths to start the
violence. Indeed Zanu PF Youths have already said they want the Police to step
aside and allow them to deal with the protesters. The party has already
promised many of these thugs housing stands and they are keen as mustard to
earn the stands! y are But given that the Police is NOT independent , not even
the political greenhorn, Tendai Biti, would dispute this; not even the “brave”
Justice Chigumba would dare challenge any protest ban after that.
3)
The banning of the protests was illegal and by lifting
the ban Justice Chigumba was not putting to right a wrong; she was not doing
anyone a favour but rather doing her duty; the right to peaceful protest is a
fundamental right and not a privilege. Mugabe has become a grandmaster at giving
with the one hand and making a big song and dance about that and yet takeaway
even more with the other. He has never tires of reminding us of his heroic
sacrifice in the war of independence but has conveniently ignore that he is yet
to hold free and fair elections; ignored that corruption has now become so rampant that $15 billion is
looted from Marange and no one is ever arrested; etc. Naïve people like Tendai
Biti are not doing the nation any favours by making a big song and dance when
the regime grant us back our right and thus, unwittingly, giving the impression
that it was a privilege that the tyrant can take away again under some new contrived
pretext!
By lifting the illegal protest ban
Justice Chigumba did NOT prove that Zimbabwe’s judiciary is now “independent”. Are
sure you will not be eating your words over this as you have done so many times
already but never learn!
We have to implement all the
democratic reforms designed to end the unhealthy tyrannical strangle hold
Mugabe has over the judiciary, Police, ZEC, etc. Only then can we talk of
Zimbabwe having an independent judiciary, Police, ZEC, etc.; confident it is so
today, tomorrow, next year and for generations to come.
1 comment:
After having praised the courts for being "independent" you cannot criticize them if they pass a judgment you know is partisan without being accuse of cherry picking.
Post a Comment