African leaders know rule of law in important in fight to end poverty, they believe THEY ARE ABOVE THE LAW. W Mukori

 The Rule of Law: Africa's Most Valuable Economic Asset

By Tinashe T. T. Mpasiri | 13 July 2026

"Justice under the rule of law is not merely a constitutional ideal, it is the foundation upon which prosperous nations are built."

Today, Facebook reminded me of a post I wrote on 13 July 2018. In that post, I distilled the rule of law into five simple principles:

1. No one is above the law, regardless of position or status.

2. Everyone must obey the law and be held accountable when they violate it.

3. The law must be applied equally, consistently and fairly.

4. Justice must be administered promptly by ethical, impartial and independent institutions.

5. The laws of the country must be clear, publicised and stable.

Eight years later, I remain convinced that these five principles are not merely legal doctrines. They represent the invisible infrastructure of every successful economy.

This conviction did not emerge overnight. It was born from a journey of inquiry that began in 2016.

That year, I deliberately set out to understand the root causes of unemployment, inequality and poverty in Zimbabwe. Rather than accepting conventional explanations, I chose to unlearn, relearn and learn. I wanted to understand why nations rich in natural resources could still struggle with unemployment, why businesses collapsed, why investment disappeared and why poverty persisted.

My search repeatedly led me to the story of  (SMM).

For decades, SMM was more than a mining company. It was an economic ecosystem. It directly employed thousands of Zimbabweans while sustaining the livelihoods of well over one hundred thousand people through employees, contractors, transporters, suppliers, retailers and surrounding communities.

Its story forced me to ask uncomfortable but necessary questions.

How does a company of such national significance cease to be an engine of prosperity?

What happens to an economy when confidence in legal certainty is weakened?

What becomes of communities when productive assets no longer generate employment and wealth?

As I studied the history of SMM and the legal issues surrounding its reconstruction under the Reconstruction of State-Indebted Insolvent Companies Act, commonly known as the Recon Act, I realised that the consequences of legal uncertainty extend far beyond courtrooms.

When respect for property rights is questioned, investors hesitate.

When investors hesitate, capital leaves.

When capital leaves, businesses shrink.

When businesses shrink, jobs disappear.

When jobs disappear, poverty expands.

That chain of events transformed my understanding of economic development.

I came to appreciate that the rule of law is not simply a legal concept. It is economic infrastructure.

Just as roads move goods, ports facilitate trade and electricity powers factories, the rule of law powers investment. It provides certainty. It protects contracts. It safeguards property rights. It assures entrepreneurs that the rewards of enterprise will not be arbitrarily taken away. It gives financial institutions the confidence to lend and businesses the confidence to expand.

Without it, sustainable economic development becomes extraordinarily difficult.

This understanding has shaped my engagements over the years.

In 2017, during the South Africa–Zimbabwe Business Forum in Sandton, Johannesburg, I had the opportunity to engage President Emmerson Mnangagwa, who was then Vice President. I argued that Zimbabwe's economic recovery would ultimately depend on restoring confidence through the rule of law. He acknowledged the importance of that assertion.

On another occasion, during the South Africa Investment Conference, President  Cyril Ramaphosa responded to my intervention by observing that it "was not a question, but a speech." While brief, that exchange reinforced my belief that conversations about investment cannot be separated from conversations about governance, institutions and legal certainty.

History consistently supports this conclusion.

The world's most prosperous economies are not necessarily those with the greatest abundance of natural resources. They are those that built strong institutions, protected property rights, enforced contracts, maintained independent courts and ensured that governments themselves remained subject to the law.

Natural resources may create opportunity.

The rule of law transforms opportunity into prosperity.

This is why I have consistently argued that the greatest competitive advantage any African nation can possess is not found beneath its soil, but within its institutions.

Africa possesses extraordinary mineral wealth, agricultural potential and one of the youngest populations in the world. Yet these advantages alone cannot guarantee prosperity. Investment follows confidence, and confidence flourishes where the rule of law prevails.

Corporate literacy therefore extends beyond understanding financial statements, governance frameworks or balance sheets. It requires an appreciation that every successful business operates within a legal environment that protects enterprise, rewards innovation and guarantees fairness.

When institutions are trusted, entrepreneurs invest.

When entrepreneurs invest, businesses grow.

When businesses grow, employment expands.

When employment expands, poverty declines.

When prosperity is created within a framework of justice, it becomes sustainable.

The lesson I drew from SMM continues to shape my thinking today.

The future of Africa will not be determined solely by the value of its minerals, the size of its markets or the sophistication of its technology. It will be determined by whether our institutions inspire confidence, whether our laws are applied equally, whether property rights are respected and whether justice remains impartial and accessible to all.

For me, the rule of law is not an academic discussion.

It is the missing link between Africa's immense potential and Africa's shared prosperity.

It is the foundation upon which banking systems are strengthened, businesses are built, industries flourish and nations become competitive.

It is, without question, Africa's most valuable economic asset.

#CorporateHeritage #CorporateLiteracy #TheAfricaIWant #BOAF

This story is not new, it has been told and retold, acted  and reenacted  hundreds of thousands times a day. If you are one of the thousand former  SMM employees still living in the ghost mine because you have nowhere else to go, this is the story of your life and that of your dependents!

In the 1970s John Robertson, a renowned Economist and Banker, advised Ian Smith, Prime Minister of then Rhodesia, that the blacks in the Tribal Trust Lands should be given title deeds to even one or two acres of land on which their mud huts are built. It would give the blacks the confidence to invest time and resources in building decent homes, improve the land by planting trees, dig wells for clean water, etc. 

With title deed, these people know that they can sell the homestead if they should ever want to move and thus recover some of their lifetime’s work. If they stay, they will have a decent home to leave their loved ones.

The advise made economic sense. Common sense!

Smith rejected the advise. Why?

Smith feared that giving the rural blacks title deeds will economically empower them. The regime had a growing economically empowered urban black population with stead monthly wage and had title deeds to the match-box high density townships. And these town-wise blacks were already demand a meaningful say in the governance of the country. 

Economic empowerment of the rural blacks will too lead to them joining the town-wise blacks in demanding political empowerment. Smith was not ready for black majority rule - “not in a thousand years!”

John Robertson gave the same advise to Robert Gabriel Mugabe, give rural blacks title deed to one or two acres of land. Mugabe rejected the advise for the same reason. Zanu PF has always considered the rural areas the party’s political strongholds and the party’s strangle hold on the rural people is based on keeping the rural folk poor and dependent on the regime. 

The cartoon of Zanu PF chef chopping off the legs of his victim with ice-cold indifference and then presenting the victim with a rickety wheelchair make a big song and dance about it; is not true physical but in every other way! Rural peasants are no more that medieval serfs forever beholden to their Zanu PF landlords!

You are right, there will never be any meaningful economic prosperity without rule of law justice and human dignity for all. Leaders like Mnangagwa, Mugabe and Smith know all that and have ignored it because they have other overriding priorities - to stay in power at all cost. They believe they have the divine right to rule and, per se, they are above the law!

Mnangagwa has just forced down the nation throat CAB3 extending his own stay in office by another two years and granting Zanu PF even more dictatorial powers. Zimbabwe has been a de facto one-party dictatorship for decades and, with the passing of CAB3, has become a de jure one-party (one-man) dictatorship!

We should be fighting for all rural people to have title deeds to one or two acres of land on which their mud huts stand. Zanu PF’s power is based on holding the rural voters hostage - free the hostages and Zanu PF so-called divine right to rule until donkeys grow horns will disappear like mist in the African sun!