In the boldest challenge ever
to Mugabe’s tyrannical, the war vets and the security chefs, notably Commander
Chiwenga, told Mugabe in no uncertain terms they constitute “the stockholders
of Zanu PF and Zimbabwe and the leaders are stakeholders who can come and go!”
On Wednesday Mugabe,
emboldened by the one-million man march organized by the party’s Youth League,
hit right back repeating his earlier statement that war vets were an affiliate
organization that cannot dictate to the party Zanu PF. The following day he
reduced the retirement age of all those serving in the security services from
60 years to 50. This clearly opened the door for Mugabe to retire many of the
former freedom fighters who have become increasingly critical of his rule.
When it suited his
political needs of imposing on the nation his no regime change mantra after he
lost the March 2008 vote, Mugabe kept the current security services chefs
beyond the official retirement age of 60 years. Now that the same chefs have
been increasingly critical of his tyrannical rule he drops the retire age even
to get rid of most of his liberation war colleagues from the security sector.
How ironic that anyone
over the age of 50 is considered too old to serve in the security sector commanded
by a 92 year old Commander-In-Chief! Needless to say it was the 92 year old
dictator who made that unilateral decision without even consulting his rubber
stamping parliament! It is great to be a dictator.
Mugabe must be sweating
because the last thing he expected was a defiant challenge to his diktat.
"We are equally
worried that these quarters within the party refuse to accept that war veterans
have an interest in Zanu-PF approximated to ownership," came the nuclear bomb
response from Zimbabwe National Liberation
War Veterans' Association (ZNLWVA) spokesperson Douglas Mahiya.
"We should have been
told during the war that we did not belong to the party and needed not join. Had
that been made clear to us, then we would have dealt with those issues in the
appropriate manner at the appropriate time."
"We need to make it
clear that war veterans cannot be retired or removed from Zanu-PF as well as
the security establishment. Any attempts to retire us on the basis of age is to
us a cover to perpetuate the regime change agenda of security sector reform.
Regime change to us means to rid Zanu-PF and the security establishment of the
liberation component, which will not be tolerated under any circumstances."
Mugabe has deliberately
undermined the independence of the state institutions like the judiciary, ZEC
and security services by appointing individuals run these institution he could
trust to neglect the institution’s democratic duties and promoted Zanu PF his
selfish objective of creating a de facto one-party cum one-man dictatorship. He
sugar coated the tyrannical pill by claiming that there were outside forces
working with the “puppet local opposition” seeking regime change.
Frankly, not even the
simpletons amongst the war vets like Jabulani Sibanda of Joseph Chinotimba ever
believed the lie of the West being behind the increasing demand for meaningful
democratic change and free and fair elections; it was ordinary Zimbabweans and
not the British or Americans, who were risking life and limp demanding change.
The war vets, security chefs and all the other Zanu PF operatives subscribed to
no regime change agenda at all cost mentality on the understanding they will have
a share in the absolute political power and the wealth and looted riches it
brought.
The root cause of Mugabe
and the war vets’ quarrel is the country’s poor economic performance which has
left more and more war vets economically destitute. Although Mugabe has once in
a while made a token payment to alleviate the war vets’ economic hardship as
the national economic sunk deeper and deeper into trouble it dragged more and
more into poverty and many war vets were caught up in the drag net.
Douglas Mahiya, Chiwenga
and all the others in the war vets and security sector know that if Mugabe was
to sever their links with Zanu PF he would have condemned them to the same
grinding poverty the majority of Zimbabweans are facing right now!
"We plead with the
party's leadership to explain to us the principle of one centre of power. We
hope it does not mean that power is vested in one person because if that is so,
then it is against the Zanu-PF constitution and traditions of the party,"
another war vet said.
"The principle of
having one centre of power needs to be explained. Power resides in the people
as represented in the central committee in between congresses. Anything beyond
that is unheard of to us and is dictatorship."
It is refreshing that some
of these war vets have finally woken up to the reality that Mugabe is a
dictator! The next thing they need to know now is that he is a corrupt,
incompetent and murderous tyrant and the economic meltdown the country is
facing is the consequence of 36 years of gross mismanagement and rampant
corruption. The misrule has continued for all these years because the nation
was denied the opportunity to elect a competent and accountable government
because the people were denied a meaningful free and fair vote.
1 comment:
I bet you anything you like, none of these opposition parties will ever get even one meaningful re-form implemented. The funny part is they will take part in the elections and then complain that Zanu PF rigged the elections afterwards.
The key to free, fair and credible elections has to be an electorate who appreciate what the reforms are about because only such voters will elect an equally competent leadership who understand what the reforms are. As long as we have a naive and gullible electorate we will always have corrupt and incompetent opposition.
The five opposition parties have signed this coalition of democrats (code) and now they are going to spend the next two years arguing about what it is exactly they have agreed on!
Post a Comment