Talk of shooting oneself in the foot before a race, this is
becoming a Tendai Biti specialty. In 2008 he is the one who jumped the gun and announced
that Morgan Tsvangirai had won 60% of the March vote after ZEC had failed to do
so timeously. A few days later Biti revised downward Tsvangirai’s win to
55% or so . Of course, MDC lost credibility; big time!
The people had no choice but to wait for ZEC’s official
announcement. It took six weeks for ZEC to finally announce the result dropping
Tsvangirai’s win to 47% - not enough to avoid the run-off. MDC did not challenge the ZEC result leaving
people to concluded that Tendai Biti’s call was guess work!
This year ZEC has once again been dragging its feet in
announcing the results. And Tendai Biti has once again jumped the gun and
announced the results.
"Our data shows we have won by 61%; Nelson Chamisa has
won 61% of the votes!” said Tendai Biti.
“If you win by this much in the presidential elections - for
instance in Masvingo (province) where Chamisa won overwhelmingly but hardly won
any parliamentary seats - something is wrong. People don't vote for a
presidential candidate of one party and not for the MPs of that party. So it's
called cheating."
Here we go again! He is announcing the result but is not
sure of his own figures!
Mr Tendai Biti have you collected all the vote counts from
all the polling stations, added them up, cross checked every figure so you are
100% sure Chamisa has won 61% of the votes?
It should be easy enough to 100% certain since each polling
station was require by law to count the vote of all the candidates and post the
result on a V11 form for all to see.
Why has Tendai Biti failed to give just one example, just
one, of a parliamentary candidate who, by Biti’s calculation, got Y votes and
yet ZEC’s announced result got X votes. This would give the public something to
sink their teeth into instead of all this nonsense of MDC claiming ZEC is
rigging the vote but no one can tell how!
There are reports that as many as 21% of the polling
stations did not post the results of the vote count as is required by law. If
this was indeed the case then why is MDC failing to just one such polling
station? Again, give the public something to sink their teeth into.
“MDC has stringent measures to stop Zanu PF rigging the
elections!” MDC has often claimed.
Well their measures did not include forcing ZEC to produce a
clean and verified voters’ roll; forcing Zanu PF to stop robbing the nation
blind to bankroll its vote-rigging and vote-buying scheme; etc. Stopping ZEC
cooking up the figures during counting is important but it is not the only way
to stop Zanu PF rigging the elections. In this case it may well turn out to be
too little too late.
“Derek Matyszak, a Zimbabwe expert at the Institute for
Security Studies in Pretoria, differed with Biti, suggesting, as other analysts
have, that Zanu-PF had already won before the first vote was cast,” reported
one of South Africa’s leading paper, Daily Maverick
"The votes in the ballot box probably match those announced," said Matyszak.
"The votes in the ballot box probably match those announced," said Matyszak.
There is merit in what Derek is saying.
Tendai Biti and his MDC Alliance friends should have never
agreed to take part in these elections without a clean and verified voters’
roll, no transparent political funding system, etc. How can you have free, fair
and credible elections when many all those entitled to vote are denied the vote;
you do know who is on the voters’ roll; you do not know how many are on the
voters’ roll but are denied the vote; etc.?
If Chamisa does not win the presidential vote then, out of
respect of the public at least, MDC must challenge the result so Tendai Biti
can show the world where he got his 61% and where ZEC got their losing figure.
3 comments:
President Mnangagwa and his junta can pretend all they want that these were free, fair and credible elections but the reality speaks of a different thing. The whole world saw for themselves that these were not free, fair and credible elections. Just because Chamisa and his MDC friends are corrupt and incompetent, so incompetent they they refused to see the elections were flawed, does not mean everyone else is also stupid and naive. The foreign investors are not impressed!
@Marailas Mechavio
I did warn these MDC idiots that, with no democratic reforms in place, Zanu PF will rig the election and now they are admitting it. As for which one of us talks sense, I will let the readers decide for themselves!
When challenged on her contention that the election was unfair, Ms Godwin said: "My concern is that for Zimbabwe, and indeed many other places in Africa, it seems to be OK for the vote to be just good enough.
"Why should that be? Why should the bar be lower for Africa? It is deeply insulting for Zimbabweans; it is deeply patronising to us; we should be held to the same standards as the rest of the world.
"And saying that it's OK, it's not too bad, there has been no bloodshed - and of course subsequent to that there has been bloodshed - I don't think that's good enough."
I have to thank Ms Godwin for renewing my faith and belief and hope that Zimbabwe can aspire a lot better than the nightmare the country is in right now. I too will find it insulting that anyone should judge the flawed and illegal elections in Zimbabwe "acceptable" much less free, fair and credible.
How can an election in which the authorities failed to give millions of citizens a fair chance to register and to vote; fail to produce a verified voters' roll, people are robbed blind to bankroll the governing party's vote-buying and vote-rigging schemes; etc.; be judged free, fair and credible?
It is even more disheartening when it is Zimbabweans themselves who are lowering the bar and show they are content with this crap! And so when one meeting a Zimbabwe who will not accept that elections with no violence is all Zimbabweans should aspire for and angrily and boldly state "that's not good enough!"
Thank you! Thank you very much for renewing my faith in a just, free, democratic and prosperous Zimbabwe; not better than any other nation but not inferior to any other nation.
Post a Comment