I
have always held London Mayor, Boris Johnson, in high regard. I have found him
to be witty and persuasive, what he said made a lot of sense. But in his
article “Happy birthday, Mr Mugabe, with special love from Labour” in (UK)
Telegraph newspaper and with extracts appearing in many other publications; he
lost my respect and high regard.
Of
all people Boris Johnson should have known that reputations are like clay pots
they are valuable only as long as they remain whole, one slip and they will shutter
into fragments of no value to anyone.
Mayor
Johnson’s article was full of his usual wit and characteristic Boris Johnson
take-no-prisoner thrust but, sadly, lacked substance because the article was
not founded of facts. He clearly did not understand the basic facts of Mugabe’s
land grab campaign; his desire to have a political “dig” at former British
Prime Minister, Tony Blair, clouded his thinking and, worst of all, his
obnoxious and overbearing British imperialist mentality got the better him.
Boris
Johnson was spot on and unsparing, calling a spade a bloody shovel, in his
description of the corrupt and murderous tyrant Mugabe, the suffering and
destruction his regime has caused and the surrealism of the upcoming
celebration of the tyrant’s birthday.
“It
promises to be an event of truly spectacular moral ugliness. While his people
are starving, the ancient despot will convoke 20,000 cronies at a kind of golf
club-cum-safari lodge near the Victoria Falls,” wrote Boris. “In scenes
reminiscent of the more disgusting and luxurious behaviour of the emperor
Commodus, he will cause various exotic beasts to be slaughtered for the feast.”
“
. . . Zimbabwe is now the second poorest
nation on earth – beaten only by Congo for overall grimness.” Spot on!
“But
it is vital to recognise that Zimbabwe was not always like this, and did not
have to be like this,” continued the London Mayor. “This Mugabe tyranny is no
accident – and Britain played a shameful part in the disaster. Readers will
remember the 1979 Lancaster House Agreement, by which Margaret Thatcher granted
independence to Rhodesia.”
The
Mayor went on to give the reader a history lesson on how Zimbabwe in 1980 had a
thriving agricultural sector dominated by the white commercial farmers who
owned most of the good land. The need for the white farmers to give up some of
their farms so that the land can be given to the impoverish peasants in
overcrowded rural areas was accepted back then. The British agreed to fund the
programme by paying the white farms on a willing seller willing buyer basis.
“Mugabe’s
long reign has been characterised by one overwhelming objective: to exterminate
the last vestiges of white power, whether political or economic,” continued
Boris. This is where he completely lost the plot; in an instant the beautiful
bride was transformed into the wicked witch, the bridal dress may be
exquisitely beautiful but it is the person and not the dress one marries.
Mugabe
appreciated the contribution the white commercial farmers were making to
Zimbabwe’s the economic prosperity that was why for the first two decades after
independence he did not do anything to disrupt the farming. He creamed off the
wealth to finance his sociality inspired mass prosperity policies; free
education, free health, hefty wage increases for the workers, artificially low
prices for many goods and services, etc. for all and for the Zanu PF ruling
elite jobs galore and all the luxuries their hearts desired.
Of
course Mugabe’s socialism was not economically sustainable and by 1989 the
regime accepted that reality. By then the economy had already lost much of its
1980 vitality and competitiveness.
In
1990 the regime was forced to accept the first of two IMF and WB sponsored
five-year Economic Structural Adjustment Programme (ESAP). The Brentwood
institutions agreed to provide the regime with the bridging finance and the
regime was to abandon all its socialist policies of the past decade.
Whilst
the ordinary people were forced to “tighten their belts” in the face of soaring
prices and falling wages, the ruling elite were “loosening their belts” as even
more resources were made available to feed their seemingly insatiable appetite
for wealth and good life.
Mugabe
did not implement any of the agreed reforms that affected the ruling elite and
it was for this reason that the first and second ESAP failed to delivery any
meaningful economic recovery.
The
WB and IMF made it very clear that they would not be renewing their financial
assistance to Mugabe’s government at the end of the second ESAP in 1999. Many other
international financial institutions and governments followed WB’s example and
cut all financial assistance to the regime.
It
was at this point, with the Zimbabwe economy on its knees and thus unable to
generate the wealth Mugabe needed to gratify the insatiable demand for loot of
his wasteful Zanu PF cronies. He was facing an election with an electorate that
had lost all confidence in his ability to deliver mass prosperity. The only
hope for him to win the election is by rigging the vote, he needed his cronies
to help him but he would have to bribe them first. The only resource left was
the land and it was at this point that he looked at the white owned farms
drooling like hyena looking at a piece of meat.
The
country’s economic mess meant he had lost a lot of credibility with the
Zimbabwe electorate but what better way to regain his political standing than
by assuming his militant and uncompromising stance of the pre-independence
years.
Whilst
the Lancaster House agreement called for farms to be acquired on a “willing
buyer and willing seller” basis; Mugabe discarded that, he would designate
which farm he wanted and name the price. The farms bought under the agreement were
for resettling the landless peasants; Mugabe threw that out, he was giving the
farms to his cronies. The agreement called for a legal acquisition; Mugabe used
his Zanu PF party thugs to drive white farmers off the land.
Of
course Mugabe knew his dirty tactics would cause disquiet and consternation and
they did and that is exactly what he wanted. When Mugabe asked the British to
pay him the billions of dollars he knew the British would find the terms
unacceptable, he was itching for a fight; and, of course the British refused to
pay.
“And
then in 1997, along came Tony Blair and New Labour, and in a fit of avowed
anti-colonialist fervour they unilaterally scrapped the arrangement,” said
Boris.
To
have paid Mugabe would have been an act of appeasement and since when has
appeasing a dictator ever worked?
Mugabe
unleashing his party thugs on the white farmers, their workers and ordinary
Zimbabweans – the political violence was never confined to the white farmers
only, it was extended to his political opponent and the electorate denying them
all a free vote under the pretext that they all sided with the white farmers.
Mayor Boris Johnson was disappointed that the British government did not send
the army to stop the thugs.
“The
Labour government enlisted this country in all sorts of wars around the world,
some more disastrous than others,” argued the London Mayor. “British soldiers
went to fight and die in Iraq, in Afghanistan, in the Balkans. Here we had
people with close relatives in our own country – yes, our own kith and kin –
and we did absolutely nothing. We turned our backs on the very people who were
actually indispensable to the economic well-being of Zimbabwe, and Labour
essentially allowed Mugabe to launch a racist tyranny.”
Mugabe
is a corrupt and murderous tyrant, period. All Zimbabweans black and white,
young and old regardless of the race and age; we have all suffered and many
have died because of his tyrannical rule. Only a hard core racist with cast
iron white supremacist mentality would see the suffering only one race and be
blind to the suffering of all the other races as if they are not human beings.
Mugabe
and his cronies have maintained throughout the years that West demonised him
and his regime because he seized the farms from the whites and not because of
his bad human rights record. After all the West imposed the target sanctions on
Mugabe and his cronies in 2002, the year most white farmers lost their farms.
Mugabe committed his worst human rights violations in 1983 to 87, the West said
nothing then. Indeed the West even showered Mugabe with praise and money right
up to 2000 when the farm seizures started!
Mugabe
has missed the opportunity to heap the blame for the country’s problems with
the British and their Western allies for destroying the country’s economy with
their “illegal and evil sanctions”.
It
is not surprising that Mugabe and his propagandists have seized upon the
outspoken London Mayor’s ill-advised comments as Papal Bull validation of the
Zanu PF’s position.
“We’ve
noted his (Boris) views, most of them inaccurate and malicious, and wonder if
this admission of guilt is the plea of the Conservative Party or an individual.
We’ll let Mr Johnson carry his own cross and deal with his guilt,” was the
triumphant response from Mugabe’s chief of propaganda, Information Minister
Jonathan Moyo.
“It
was Labour’s betrayal of the Lancaster House Agreement – driven by political
correctness and cowardice – that gave Mugabe the pretext for the despotic
confiscations by which he has rewarded his supporters. And that is why Blair
should be there (Mugabe’s birthday party): to mark Labour’s special
contribution to the tyrant’s longevity in office,” concluded Mayor Boris
Johnson.
Like all tyrannical
regimes Mugabe and his brainwashed followers will filter out all the ugly
truths of the regime’s greed and of feasting whilst millions are starving in
Mayor Johnson’s article and discard them as “inaccurate and malicious”. What
will be left is the Boris’ admission of British betrayal! And that is what they
will be drinking a toast to at the birthday party.
So it you, London Mayor Boris
Johnson, who should attend Mugabe’s macabre Victoria Fall birthday party; they
will be talking about your admission and drinking a toast to it; it is you who
should be helping Mugabe blow out the candles!