For a University lecturer anywhere this is really an article of
the poorest quality. The English is perfect but the content is trash.
"UK policy on Zimbabwe
was based on the belief that Mugabe would lose in the 2013 elections", we
are told. That is nonsense, it was clear to everyone, other than the MDC and
its leadership (and no doubt the writer too) than Mugabe was going to win the
2013 elections because the former had failed to implement not even one
democratic reform.
The argument that if the British Prime Minister was to boycott the
Brussels meeting because Mugabe was there then he must also boycott if Kenya's
President Uhuru Kenyatta attended is problematic because the two African
leaders are different and circumstances are different. If the boycott is to be
bases on the number of people murdered, “over 1 000” then the write should
point out that Robert Mugabe has murdered over 30 000!
The thrust of the writer’s argument is that the British PM should
not boycott the meeting because Mugabe is there since he was not going to do
the same if President Kenyatta attended; a fallacious argument. If boycott the
meeting if Mugabe attends is the right thing (I believe it is indeed the right
thing) then to abandon that course of action just because he could or could not
in another independent situation is stupid.
When the West imposed the sanctions on Mugabe for failing to hold
free and fair elections they showed the tyrant that they did not just call for
human rights but meant it. The West was showing its commitment to justice and
human rights for the oppressed masses. In the July 2013 elections Mugabe
blatantly rigged the elections and thus once again denying the ordinary
Zimbabweans their most basic right.
If the West was to disregard what Mugabe has done then every other
African leader would want to do the same, blatantly rig the elections. The West
will be able to do anything then because they would have lost all credibility.
How anyone can construe that as “constructive influence” beggars belief!
2 comments:
@ Dude
Are you saying it is ok for anyone to rig elections? The West should not be seen to be encouraging those who rig elections.
How can the West be said to have "constructive influence" when they have just lost their credibility over free and fair elections by allowing Mugabe to get away with blatant vote rigging?
@ Guest
I agree with you. Trust Mugabe to have a lot dirty on Tsangirai and trust the tyrant to spill the beans if the heat on him becomes unbearable.
Post a Comment